Sunday, May 21, 2017

Mass Indoctrination - The Most Powerful Tool / Weapon Ever

Human societies can be controlled according to what the majority believe to be true. The beneficiaries of the popular belief are given opportunity for unfettered power and related control which can be employed to both maintain and entrench the popular belief. 

But broad-based intelligence in a society can become a threat to those with the inherited primeval urge for power and control. Since the retention of power requires control of opposition then the intelligence must also be controlled. Education must be controlled. The internet must be controlled.

The above logic may also provide some input to explain why different societies have developed intelligence at differing pace or not at all, as DNA analysis can show.

Susceptibility to indoctrination and resulting obedience or radicalization can also be indicated. This is because we are animals and have been channelled into groupings of type of sub-species by the same mechanisms that affect all reproducing life forms.

Culture is superstition wrapped up in indoctrination. Culling intelligence makes the retention of power and control much easier.

Something else...

Conspiracy Theories that Proved to be True

Monday, May 15, 2017

Question More

Have you ever been indoctrinated? Would you know? How can you tell?

The most severe cases of irreversible indoctrination are undertaken by parents upon their infant children. This is used to condition the child into conformance with the cultural norms and expectations of the society that they believe themselves to be freely associated with.

Of course there is no such thing as freedom. This applies especially in societies where minds and related thoughts are closed and inhibited by indoctrination instead of the "free" version of mind control where the laws of nature provide the ultimate boundary.

Indoctrination is a gentle and subtle process that demonstrates punishment involving emotional and/or physical pain should any non-compliance ever occur. The methodology is universal but the scope of application varies.

Fear is the stick but greed can become the most effective carrot of all and often is.

Monday, May 08, 2017

Foul Language Grammy Winners

Grammy awards are now promoting blatant smut. The 2016 award for Best Dance/Electronic Album was "Skin" by Aussie group "Flume". This album includes the track entitled "Wall Fuck".
Next thing for promotion can be the live recording of farts accompanied by vomiting with a target audience of drugged up primary school ravers. That should make Song of the Year 2017. Profit has no conscience and nor does the sickness called the American Music and Drug Industry.
The otherwise brainless stoop into the crud has been applauded for well over a generation. Toilet training has been so futile that the epidemic of foul-mouthed bacteria is now resistant to every form of common sense, which was always the arch opponent for society-destroying addictionist recruits.
Drug tests in most metros now have the potential for 100% fail rates across the populace. Consensus has it that the players are all in full control of their collective illusion. How do those well worn lyrics go? - who gives a fuck anymore?


Sunday, January 22, 2017

The Truth Is...

The pen is mightier than the media? More like ink wars. The media is corralling itself and needs very little assistance with the spectacular route it has chosen to find its eventual home of large scale irrelevance.

So what is fake news? You must start with a hidden agenda and then portray yourself as genuine, knowledgeable, forthright and trustworthy albeit that the only collateral for such a loan from your audience is your personal charm and presence.  Then you make statements in support of your hidden agenda that are regularly even more devoid of facts or verification criteria than any religious doctrine.
With the blind faith of your indoctrinated audience running freely you can cast your net wider with statements such as...
"The Truth Is...."  "The Fact Is..."
It helps to have some material that lends support to your fake claims so as to hide your otherwise barefaced lies. Carefully edited scenes using well trained and hungry actors usually does the trick.

Now you take the fight to your opponent in truly underhanded style. It usually works for a while, but then it typically backfires when your opponent takes it to task and systematically shoots it all down with genuine and verifiable material. And once your credibility is gone then your opponent just keeps hounding and pounding you with expose after expose until there is no living creature that will ever give you the time of day ever again. You will probably become very busy defending an array of civil claims any one of which will destroy you financially. Then your previous benefactor megalomaniac mega billionaire promoter of The New World Order will refuse to rescue you or in any way associate with you or any of your equally pariah colleagues who will be regarded by all as your partners in crime.
After all he (your previous megalomaniac benefactor such as G {God} Soros for example) is busy trying to install fake democracy everywhere (but especially in an expanded Europe) because the biggest threat to his personal control of all via his New World Order scam is the power of the disenchanted people. In desperation he is now trying to initiate mayhem as a cover for the change to centralized power and control of the planet which will take a war between the super powers to bring about. The petrifying fear of a real life Hiroshima and Nagasaki in your place today is always a good distraction.

Its just natural that only the fit have the chance of survival. The defeating of nature does not have many proven long term examples. None come to mind, other than the systematic indoctrination of children from birth and the immediate murder of any independent thinking deviant. With a massive cult of robots anything is possible.

Any average Joe might feel a tad confused or maybe even intimidated, but you can watch some sport and forget all about it. In which case you will have no time for any of this except when you watch your favourite TV propaganda station. Its always so much easier when you don't have to think for yourself and you just agree with everyone else.

Monday, January 16, 2017

Soros in 2017 - More Hell on Earth

No Sir, I did not know what makes this megalomaniac tick, I did not know why he keeps doing evil and good and evil disguised as good. I just knew he was important in most geopolitical matters and a cornerstone of the Bilderbergian NWO (New World Order). I could never understand much at all about how some supposed good has entwined itself into so much evil. But now, for the first time, I have come across some reasoning that is understandable...

And I think someone close to him should try to help this man with his problem before millions more have to die.

Sunday, November 20, 2016

Purveyors of Shamocracy

Shamocracy needs lots of Journalists without Ethics, an association of like minded con artists who will present fiction as fact for favor and strive hard to always take the public for a horde of ingrates.
Real Journalists are no longer wanted. But most of all they are all shamed by not even attempting to do something, anything about exposing the most important truth of all or even trying to exercise any form of control.

Accordingly there can be no Journalist who has not brought the profession into its current irreparable state of disrepute.

The evidence just keeps piling up e.g.

Thursday, November 17, 2016

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Toilet Training for Law Makers

Business Day 12 October 2016 - 06:26 AM Natasha Marrian and Franny Rabkin

Zuma’s empire strikes back hard
Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan will not go down without a fight even as Jacob Zuma makes another charge to dislodge the defender of the public purse
President Jacob Zuma’s scorched earth policy is in effect. A Cabinet reshuffle is the next weapon he is likely to deploy as he moves to capture the Treasury, and Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan has been targeted as the next casualty.
In the 10 months since Gordhan’s reappointment was foisted on Zuma, it has been glaringly obvious that the president and those seeking control of the nation’s purse have not been defeated. Gordhan has been isolated from the president and the Cabinet.
Zuma professed after his removal of Nhlanhla Nene from the ministry last December that Des van Rooyen was the most qualified finance minister the country had been privileged to have — albeit for only four days.
Since then, Zuma has regrouped and has launched his next salvo, one he hopes will be a killer blow. It began with a dodgy intelligence dossier surfacing in August 2015 — accusing Treasury officials of being apartheid agents — which was the first indication that the Treasury was in the cross hairs. The strange document aimed at smearing senior Treasury officials was dismissed by Nene, but since then its contents have been used by senior ANC and government officials to justify "reining in the Treasury".
The charges announced on Tuesday by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) against Gordhan are questionable at best. What began as an investigation into an alleged rogue unit at the South African Revenue Service (SARS) has culminated in a criminal charge relating to an administrative act during Gordhan’s first term as finance minister in 2010.
The statement made by NPA head Shaun Abrahams on the criminal charges against Gordhan dealt with two "totally separate" issues. There was an investigation into the so-called rogue investigative unit and there were charges related to former acting SARS commissioner Ivan Pillay’s early retirement.
The rogue unit investigation was ongoing, said Abrahams. No charges were announced on this. Instead, the charges for which Gordhan, Pillay and former SARS commissioner Oupa Magashula must appear in court relate to Pillay’s early retirement and his subsequent re-employment.
Of the four counts — three of fraud and one breach of the Public Finance Management Act — Gordhan is an accused in two of them. The charge against the minister alleges that, when he authorised SARS to pay an early retirement penalty of R1.1m on behalf of Pillay, he had "pretended" that SARS was liable to pay this money while knowing it was not.
A possible defence to this charge could be that SARS was legally authorised to make the payment or that Gordhan did not know that SARS was not liable.
In answering the Hawks questions on the pension fund issue, Gordhan said in March that Magashula had inquired from the Department of Public Service about the terms of Pillay’s early retirement. He had established that these "were lawful and not unusual", he added.
"I approved Mr Magashula’s proposal because I believed it to be entirely above board," he said.
What evidence the NPA has in its arsenal to counter this statement was not disclosed at Abrahams’s press conference.
Magashula and Pillay face additional charges, one relating to the Public Finance Management Act. The charge sheet refers to sections 38, 39 and 45. It says Magashula, "acting in concurrence" with Pillay, did not prevent irregular, wasteful and fruitless and unauthorised expenditure. Sections 38 and 39 deal with the general and budgetary control duties of an accounting officer — which Magashula was as commissioner. They require the accounting officer to take steps to prevent irregular, wasteful and fruitless and unauthorised expenditure.
Section 45 does not appear to give rise to criminal liability under the act, so it is unclear why it is on the charge sheet.
The other two fraud counts relate to new employment contracts for Pillay, saying that fraud was committed because he and Magashula knew SARS was authorised to enter into only a three-year contract and not a five-year contract. Gordhan's authorisation of the four-year contract in 2014 was also allegedly fraudulent because they knew that SARS was under no obligation to extend Pillay's earlier contract. 
Rogue unit
While the charge sheet says that these acts were committed "with prejudice" to SARS — the suffering of prejudice being a requirement for a fraud charge — it does not specify what the prejudice is in these instances.
On the rogue unit, Abrahams said the investigation into alleged criminal conduct on the part of the unit was continuing. But this was preceded by a lengthy account of allegations about the unit’s unlawful establishment.
Debate has raged over whether the unit was indeed unlawfully established since this finding was made by a panel chaired by Muzi Sikhakhane SC.
In this debate a crucial distinction seems to have been lost. Whether the unit was unlawfully established is a different inquiry from whether its activities were criminal. Even if the unit was unlawfully established, the NPA’s mandate is restricted to acts that can give rise to criminal charges. In the scandal there have been such allegations — most significantly that the unit criminally bugged the offices of the NPA in an operation known as Project Sunday Evenings.
While these would fall within the NPA’s mandate, it is unclear why Abrahams spent such a significant portion of his press conference talking about whether the unit was unlawfully established — only to end with a statement that the criminal investigation was continuing.
The first indication that there would be no smooth sailing for Gordhan after his reappointment was the defiance displayed by Zuma’s pointman at SARS, commissioner Tom Moyane, when Gordhan asked that he halt a far-reaching restructuring. Then, on the eve of the February budget, the Hawks delivered 27 questions to Gordhan relating to the unit established during his tenure as SARS commissioner.
Eskom and Denel’s leadership have launched unrestrained attacks on the Treasury — Eskom over scrutiny of dodgy coal contracts with the Gupta family, and Denel while defending a joint venture with VR Laser Asia, a company partly owned by a Gupta associate, Salim Essa.
Gordhan has pushed back against every attempt to capture state-owned enterprises.
While sentiment in the ANC is slowly shifting, it is nowhere near enough to halt the Zuma assault on the public purse, which has long been in play.
ANC secretary-general Gwede Mantashe boarded a plane to China ahead of the news breaking on Tuesday about Gordhan’s fraud charge, but other senior ANC leaders expressed shock and disbelief.
One of them expressed hope that this was the final nail in the Zuma administration’s coffin and that the party would rally around Gordhan to rid the ANC of its most destructive force in the postdemocratic era.
But this is wildly optimistic – the ANC’s national executive committee remains a deer in the headlights, unable to move against the unassailable wall Zuma has built around himself.
When Public Protector Thuli Madonsela releases a preliminary report into state capture in the next few days — which Zuma has tried to stall and defer to her successor — the party’s inability to act against its president will again be on display. Madonsela has made it clear Zuma has to answer to allegations "implicating him" in violating the Executive Ethics Code.
ANC provincial leaders say signs are that history is repeating itself and that Gordhan would become a figure to rally around in the ANC’s 2017 succession battle, just as Zuma had before the Polokwane conference.
The South African Communist Party (SACP) — which is already on record as an anti-Zuma and anti-Premier League bloc in the alliance backing Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa to succeed Zuma — echoes this belief.
The SACP labels the charges against Gordhan as "putative" and says it believes that the Hawks’ pursuit of him is politically motivated. The probe into the rogue unit, it says, is intended to ensure Gordhan’s removal from office to weaken the Treasury in its fight against state capture and corruption.
Further evidence, say ANC insiders, is Zuma’s reluctance to sign the amendments to the Financial Intelligence Act into law at the behest of a single organisation after they had been passed by the Cabinet and approved by a Parliament in which the ANC holds the overwhelming majority of seats.
The SACP says the timing of the summons served on Gordhan bears an "eerie similarity" to the events that led to charges being brought against Zuma between 2003 and 2007.
The ramifications will be felt by all the factions positioning themselves for the ANC’s succession race. The argument for leadership by "consensus", pushed by a group of Zuma allies, may collapse if their political principal does not tread carefully — particularly as the ANC heads woundedly towards a crucial national election in 2019.
The AU Commission’s chairwoman, Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, was billed as this group’s preferred candidate, but increasingly there is talk that some are mobilising support for ANC chairwoman Baleka Mbete. The selection of this group’s leader is key — as a trade unionist put it, Zuma may push it to a point where "even the scent of him" in 2019 may damage the ANC’s campaign.
But Gordhan will not go down without a fight, as demonstrated by his statement on Tuesday — which was made in the face of the ANC’s invocation of a Mangaung conference resolution that recommended that senior officials step aside of their own volition should they face damaging charges.
Zuma should tread carefully if he plans to use the resolution to extract Gordhan from the Treasury – he is facing 783 criminal counts himself and his legal escape routes are dwindling.

Saturday, July 09, 2016

US pushes the World towards Nuclear War

Friday, July 8, 2016

US pushes the World towards Nuclear War

"How do you not understand that the world is being pulled in an irreversible
direction? You people do not feel the impending danger
[...] I don't know how
to get through to you people
", said Vladimir Putin at a meeting with foreign
journalists at the conclusion of the Saint Petersburg International Economic
Forum on June 17th, when he left no one in any doubt that the world is headed
down a course which could lead to nuclear war
If the current situation continues, the outcome could be a devastating nuclear conflict. Washington poured five billion dollars into Ukraine with the aim of eventually instigating a coup on Russia’s doorstep. Washington and NATO are supporting proxy forces on the ground to kill and drive out those who are demanding autonomy from the US puppet regime in Kiev. Hundreds of thousands have fled across the border into Russia. Yet it is Washington that accuses Moscow of invading Ukraine, of having had a hand in the downing of a commercial airliner and of ‘invading’ Ukraine based on no evidence at all – trial by media courtesy of Washington’s PR machine. As a result of this Russian ‘aggression’, Washington slapped sanctions on Moscow.

The ultimate aim is to de-link Europe’s economy from Russia and weaken Russia’s energy dependent economy by denying it export markets. The ultimate aim is to also ensure Europe remains integrated with/dependent on Washington, not least via the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and in the long term via US gas and Middle East oil (sold in dollars, thereby boosting the strength of the currency upon which US global hegemony rests). The mainstream corporate media in the West parrots the accusations against Moscow as fact, despite Washington having cooked up evidence or invented baseless pretexts. As with Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and other ‘interventions’ that have left a trail of death and devastation in their wake, the Western corporate media’s role is to act as cheerleader for official policies and US-led wars of terror. The reality is that the US has around 800 military bases in over 100 countries and military personnel in almost 150 countries. US spending on its military dwarfs what the rest of the world spends together. It outspends China by a ratio of 6:1. What does the corporate media say about this? That the US is a ‘force for good’ and constitutes the ‘world’s policeman’ – not a calculating empire underpinned by militarism. By the 1980s, Washington’s wars, death squads and covert operations were responsible for six million deaths in the ‘developing’ world. An updated figure suggests that figure is closer to ten million. Breaking previous agreements made with Russia/the USSR, over the past two decades the US and NATO has moved into Eastern Europe and continues to encircle Russia and install missile systems aimed at it. It has also surrounded Iran with military bases. It is destabilizing Pakistan and ‘intervening’ in countries across Africa to weaken Chinese trade and investment links and influence. It intends to eventually militarily ‘pivot’ towards Asia to encircle China.

Speech by Sahra Wagenknecht in the German Bundestag debate on July 7th
over the Government Declaration on the NATO Summit in Warsaw: "The US
nuclear weapons in Germany are to be modernized - not degraded, Mrs Merkel:
modernized - and missile bases are to be set up in Europe. Supposedly it's
all about deterrence, i.e. to keep Putin from invading the Baltics. I would
be really interested to know whether those who tell us this nonsense, believe
it themselves, even for a second
Washington’s game plan for Russia is to destroy it as a functioning state or to permanently weaken it so it submits to US hegemony. While the mainstream media in the West set out to revive the Cold War mentality and demonize Russia, Washington believes it can actually win a nuclear conflict with Russia. It no longer regards nuclear weapons as a last resort but part of a conventional theater of war and is willing to use them for pre-emptive strikes. Washington is accusing Russia of violating Ukraine’s territorial sovereignty, while the US has its military, mercenary and intelligence personnel inside Ukraine. It is moreover putting troops in Poland, engaging in ‘war games’ close to Russia and has pushed through a ‘Russian anti-aggression’ act that portrays Russia as an aggressor in order to give Ukraine de facto membership of NATO and thus full military support, advice and assistance. Washington presses ahead regardless as Russia begins to undermine dollar hegemony by trading oil and gas and goods in rubles and other currencies. And history shows that whenever a country threatens the dollar, the US does not idly stand by. Unfortunately, most members of the Western public believe the lies being fed to them. This results from the corporate media amounting to little more than an extension of Washington’s propaganda arm. The PNAC, under the pretext of some bogus ‘war on terror’, is partly built on gullible, easily led public opinion, which is fanned by emotive outbursts from politicians and the media. We have a Pavlov’s dog public and media, which respond on cue to the moralistic bleating of politicians who rely on the public’s ignorance to facilitate war and conflict. 

If Putin is reacting in a certain way, it is worth wondering what the US response would be if Russia had put its missiles in Canada near the US border, had destabilized Mexico and was talking of putting missiles there too. To top it off, imagine if Russia were applying sanctions on the US for all of this ‘aggression’.